🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.